In the wake of rising tensions with China, a wave of anti-China legislation is sweeping across state legislatures in the US. Critics warn that these bills pose a threat to free speech and individual rights, with some provisions bearing eerie similarities to McCarthyism.
Lawmakers have introduced numerous bills aimed at curbing Chinese influence, from foreign agent registries to strict regulations on business dealings with Chinese companies. These measures are often justified as efforts to combat Chinese espionage or propaganda, but civil liberties advocates see them as a thinly veiled attempt to suppress dissenting voices and intimidate critics of US policy.
State Shield and State Armor, two dark-money organizations with opaque funding streams, have played a key role in fueling this legislative frenzy. Founded in 2023 and 2024 respectively, these groups are now testifying in favor of state-level foreign agent registries that go far beyond the existing Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA).
These bills, which aim to create a national registry for foreign agents working on behalf of entities deemed "adversary" countries, have sparked concerns about their potential impact on ordinary citizens. For instance, a Nebraska bill requires businesses, universities, and humanitarian organizations to register as foreign agents if they conduct activities that involve advocacy on behalf of a foreign principal.
Critics argue that these provisions are overly broad and could lead to the persecution of innocent individuals or groups. "A lot of everyday businesses will be stumped when they have to attest to this question: Are you in compliance with the Foreign Adversary and Terrorist Agent Registration Act?" said Spike Eickholt, a government liaison at the ACLU of Nebraska.
The stakes are high, with penalties ranging from $50,000 to deportation for noncitizens. This could have a chilling effect on citizens across states that have passed such laws, forcing them to self-censor or fear registration.
While some lawmakers argue that these measures are necessary to combat Chinese influence, critics see them as part of a larger trend towards McCarthyism and the suppression of dissenting voices. "This would be like if George W. Bush had said Code Pink was Al Qaeda," said Miles Taylor, a former chief of staff for the Department of Homeland Security.
As the debate around these bills continues to unfold, one thing is clear: the fight over free speech and individual rights in the US has taken a dark turn β with dark money and opaque funding streams fueling the push towards authoritarianism.
				
			Lawmakers have introduced numerous bills aimed at curbing Chinese influence, from foreign agent registries to strict regulations on business dealings with Chinese companies. These measures are often justified as efforts to combat Chinese espionage or propaganda, but civil liberties advocates see them as a thinly veiled attempt to suppress dissenting voices and intimidate critics of US policy.
State Shield and State Armor, two dark-money organizations with opaque funding streams, have played a key role in fueling this legislative frenzy. Founded in 2023 and 2024 respectively, these groups are now testifying in favor of state-level foreign agent registries that go far beyond the existing Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA).
These bills, which aim to create a national registry for foreign agents working on behalf of entities deemed "adversary" countries, have sparked concerns about their potential impact on ordinary citizens. For instance, a Nebraska bill requires businesses, universities, and humanitarian organizations to register as foreign agents if they conduct activities that involve advocacy on behalf of a foreign principal.
Critics argue that these provisions are overly broad and could lead to the persecution of innocent individuals or groups. "A lot of everyday businesses will be stumped when they have to attest to this question: Are you in compliance with the Foreign Adversary and Terrorist Agent Registration Act?" said Spike Eickholt, a government liaison at the ACLU of Nebraska.
The stakes are high, with penalties ranging from $50,000 to deportation for noncitizens. This could have a chilling effect on citizens across states that have passed such laws, forcing them to self-censor or fear registration.
While some lawmakers argue that these measures are necessary to combat Chinese influence, critics see them as part of a larger trend towards McCarthyism and the suppression of dissenting voices. "This would be like if George W. Bush had said Code Pink was Al Qaeda," said Miles Taylor, a former chief of staff for the Department of Homeland Security.
As the debate around these bills continues to unfold, one thing is clear: the fight over free speech and individual rights in the US has taken a dark turn β with dark money and opaque funding streams fueling the push towards authoritarianism.