CBS News heavily edits Trump 60 Minutes interview, cutting boast network 'paid me a lotta money'

CBS News has come under fire once again after heavily editing down an interview with Donald Trump, the latest in a string of controversies surrounding the network's handling of presidential candidates. Trump sat down with Norah O'Donnell for 90 minutes, but only about 28 minutes made the airwaves. A full transcript and extended version were later released, shedding light on the extent of the edits.

The interview sparked memories of Trump's previous lawsuit against CBS over an edited segment featuring Kamala Harris, which he claimed was deceptive and designed to boost her chances in the presidential election. The network eventually settled with Trump for $16 million, agreeing to release transcripts of future interviews with presidential candidates. However, the settlement did not include an apology or admission of wrongdoing.

During Sunday's 60 Minutes program, O'Donnell reminded viewers that Trump had indeed paid CBS a substantial amount of money, but that this fact was omitted from the broadcast. In uncut footage, Trump boasted about receiving payment for his appearance on the show, stating that it "was forced to pay me a lot" due to allegedly manipulating the content of Harris's segment.

Trump also used the opportunity to praise new CBS News editor-in-chief Bari Weiss, whom he described as a "great person," despite being unfamiliar with her. His effusive praise for new owner David Ellison and his family, who are now in control of Paramount through Skydance Media, saw him calling their acquisition of CBS News "the greatest thing that's happened" to the press.

Among the answers edited out of the broadcast were several claims questioning the integrity of the 2020 presidential election. Trump also tried to get O'Donnell to acknowledge crime reduction in Washington DC, where she resides, only to be met with skepticism from the correspondent.

The heavy editing has raised questions about CBS News's commitment to accuracy and fairness. Critics argue that such tactics undermine public trust in journalism and blur the lines between opinion and fact.
 
omg, this is so sus! like, can't they just have a real convo without messing it up? i'm not surprised tho, tbh. remember when we did a group project on the importance of unbiased reporting in class? it's crazy how some ppl don't get it πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ. and yeah, the fact that he got paid but didn't even mention it during the convo is low-key shady πŸ’β€β™‚οΈ. what really gets me is that they settled with him for $16 million without apologizing πŸ€‘. i mean, can't we just expect truthfulness from news outlets? it's like, come on CBS News, do better next time πŸ‘€.
 
πŸ˜’ I'm so tired of these networks playing editor's games. Like, what's the deal with all these "settlements" they pay out? $16 million for a settlement doesn't mean squat when you're still editing down interviews willy-nilly! πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ And don't even get me started on Trump - if he was gonna say something shady, why did they cut it off in the first place? Sounds like they're trying to shape the narrative rather than report the facts. Can we trust CBS News to do their job without the agenda? πŸ’”
 
I'm so done with these networks and their agendas πŸ™„. I mean, come on, 28 minutes out of a 90-minute interview? That's not even close to fair representation. And now they're releasing transcripts and expecting us to believe that was just an accident? Please πŸ™„. This is exactly why we need more transparency and accountability in journalism.

And what really gets my blood boiling is that Trump got away with praising the new owners of CBS News like he's some kind of best friend 🀝. Like, hello, you're trying to manipulate the narrative here! And don't even get me started on how they left out the part about Trump paying them for his appearance on the show πŸ€‘. It's all about spin and control.

We need journalists who are committed to telling the truth, not just serving the interests of those in power πŸ’”. I'm calling on CBS News to take a hard look at their editing process and make some real changes. We deserve better πŸ”΄
 
OMG 🀯 this is getting out of hand! I mean, I get it, Trump can be a wild card, but come on, CBS News is supposed to be a reputable news source, not some tabloid 😳. First, it's Harris' segment, now it's Trump himself, and what's the common thread? Editing for ratings? πŸ“Ί It's like they're trying to create drama where none exists.

And can we talk about the fact that Trump is essentially gloating about getting paid for his appearance on the show? Like, yeah, okay, you paid us, now leave. πŸ˜’ And those "great" people he's praising at CBS News and Paramount? Give me a break. It's all just a big PR stunt to keep him in the public eye.

The thing that really bothers me is when they edit out facts and instead try to steer the conversation towards Trump's narrative. What about accuracy and fairness, though? πŸ€” Shouldn't journalists be trying to get at the truth, not push an agenda? The public deserves better than this kind of manipulation. πŸ’₯
 
Dude πŸ€”, I'm so done with these editing controversies 🚫. Like, can't we just get the real tea 🍡 from our journalists? I mean, I know CBS News is trying to make a buck off Trump's ratings πŸ’Έ, but at what cost? The integrity of journalism is like, super important πŸ“°.

According to an analysis by the fact-checking site Snopes πŸ“Š, during the 2020 presidential election, there were over 50 lawsuits filed against news outlets for allegedly misrepresenting or misquoting candidates. Meanwhile, Trump's own tweet about Kamala Harris has been debunked like 10 times πŸ”΄.

The stats on public trust in journalism are grim 🚨. A 2022 Pew Research Center survey found that only 27% of Americans trust the media "almost always" or "most of the time". Compare that to 64% who say they're not sure what's true and what's not πŸ˜•.

Visualizing this, let's take a look at the graph on public trust in journalism over the past few years πŸ“ˆ. It's like, super flatlining ⬇️. We need journalists who are willing to do the hard work of fact-checking and holding politicians accountable πŸ’ͺ.

Here's some data on Trump's edited interviews 🀯:

* Average editing time: 75% of interviews
* Time spent on unedited segments: 28-50 minutes (avg.)
* Number of claims from Trump questioning election integrity: 12

Dude, we need to wake up and demand better journalism πŸ’₯!
 
omg, can't believe CBS News is at it again πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ! I mean, seriously, 28 minutes out of a full hour-long interview? That's just ridiculous. And to think they're trying to spin this as "editing for time" – please, that's just code for "we didn't want Trump saying anything bad" πŸ˜‚. The fact that they settled with him for $16 million and didn't even get an apology or acknowledgment of wrongdoing is just wild. It's like they're above the law or something. And what's up with Norah O'Donnell trying to deflect by mentioning Trump paid CBS? Like, yeah, we get it, he paid, but that doesn't excuse the editing πŸ€‘. I'm so done with these networks thinking they can just manipulate the narrative and get away with it 😑. They need to step up their game and prioritize accuracy and fairness over ratings πŸ’―.
 
omg, this is soooo not good for CBS News πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ! I mean, they already had a settlement with Trump over Harris's interview, but now it looks like they're still not being transparent about their editing process πŸ“Ί. I'm all for condensing interviews into manageable chunks, but you can't just cut out entire sections and expect everyone to be cool with it πŸ˜’. It's like they think they're above the law or something, which is super concerning 🚨. Trump's comments about paying CBS a lot for his appearance on 60 Minutes are basically admitting that he manipulated the content... what a mess! πŸ‘€
 
πŸ€” I mean, come on... 90 minutes of an interview and only 28 minutes air? That's just crazy talk! πŸ™„ And what's even crazier is they were able to get away with it without anyone calling them out on it for years... until now, that is. It's like they thought no one would notice the massive edit job.

And let's not forget about Trump's lawsuit against CBS over Kamala Harris. I'm all for transparency in journalism, but $16 million seems like a pretty big price to pay for not releasing transcripts of future interviews. Like, did they really think that was worth it? πŸ€‘

It's also got me thinking... if you're gonna air an interview with a presidential candidate, shouldn't they be able to trust that what they say is going to be represented accurately? I mean, it's not like Trump was just spouting off for the sake of being weird... he had some pretty specific claims about election integrity.

And can we talk about Bari Weiss and David Ellison for a second? Like, who are these people? And why does Trump feel the need to praise them so heavily? It's all just so... awkward. 😳

Anyway, I guess what I'm trying to say is that this whole situation has got me thinking about the state of journalism in our country. Can we really trust the news anymore? πŸ“°
 
Back
Top