Meghan Markle's affinity for her royal title remains puzzling, even as she and Prince Harry navigate their life outside the British monarchy. The Duchess of Sussex still insists on being addressed by her aristocratic honorifics, a decision that has raised eyebrows among those who question the couple's motives.
Harry and Meghan have shrugged off queries about why they hold onto their titles despite their high-profile separation from the royal family. "What difference would that make?" Harry responded when asked in 2023. However, it's clear that this choice has not gone unnoticed. The public's perception of the couple is increasingly tied to their adherence to traditional royal protocol.
A recent Harper's Bazaar profile on Meghan highlights her continued use of her title, even in informal settings. A house manager at one of her friend's homes was instructed to address her as "Meghan, Duchess of Sussex," much to the surprise of those present. This display of dedication to her aristocratic identity has sparked debate among fans and critics alike.
The contrast between Meghan's commitment to her title and the sacrifices required of royal duty cannot be overlooked. While she and Harry have made significant contributions to various causes, their involvement in high-profile events like receiving the Humanitarians of the Year award raises questions about their level of dedication to the humanitarian work they advocate for.
Critics argue that the Sussexes' enthusiasm for titles and accolades overshadows their actual efforts in promoting meaningful change. The divide between those who support Meghan's commitment to her title and those who criticize it suggests a need for greater introspection from the royal couple about their own values and priorities.
Harry and Meghan have shrugged off queries about why they hold onto their titles despite their high-profile separation from the royal family. "What difference would that make?" Harry responded when asked in 2023. However, it's clear that this choice has not gone unnoticed. The public's perception of the couple is increasingly tied to their adherence to traditional royal protocol.
A recent Harper's Bazaar profile on Meghan highlights her continued use of her title, even in informal settings. A house manager at one of her friend's homes was instructed to address her as "Meghan, Duchess of Sussex," much to the surprise of those present. This display of dedication to her aristocratic identity has sparked debate among fans and critics alike.
The contrast between Meghan's commitment to her title and the sacrifices required of royal duty cannot be overlooked. While she and Harry have made significant contributions to various causes, their involvement in high-profile events like receiving the Humanitarians of the Year award raises questions about their level of dedication to the humanitarian work they advocate for.
Critics argue that the Sussexes' enthusiasm for titles and accolades overshadows their actual efforts in promoting meaningful change. The divide between those who support Meghan's commitment to her title and those who criticize it suggests a need for greater introspection from the royal couple about their own values and priorities.
. She's still a down-to-earth girl who just happens to have had a pretty high-profile life.
.
. I mean, sure, it shows she's still dedicated to her roots but sometimes you gotta let go of the past and focus on what's next. Its not about being royal, its about doing good and making a change. They're always talking about empowering women and stuff, but is holding onto their titles really the best way to do that? 
... but only if you're into that sorta thing! Meghan still wants to be called Duchess, even when she's just chillin' at her friend's house with a glass of wine 
. I'm not sure what's more puzzling, her love for titles or the fact that people are actually taking notice 
.
... who am I to judge, right? 
I mean, if they're not part of the royal fam anymore, do they really need to use it? It's like wearing a crown to the grocery store just for fun 
.