Dodgers take Game 7 to win World Series

This is a long HTML code snippet that contains various elements, including tables, images, and text. It appears to be part of an HTML document that displays news articles.

However, I can try to provide some insights or suggestions based on the content.

The HTML code seems to be using a mix of semantic tags (e.g., `<header>`, `<nav>`) with non-semantic tags (e.g., `<div>`, `<span>`). It's recommended to use only semantic tags whenever possible, as they provide better structure and accessibility for users with disabilities.

Additionally, some of the HTML elements seem to be duplicated or not properly nested. For example, there are multiple instances of `<img>` tags within a single `<article>` element. This could lead to unnecessary rendering and potential issues with accessibility.

The code also uses various CSS classes (e.g., `styles_newsNow__M_63_`, `styles_img__gUAMI`) that suggest it's using some sort of styling or themeing system. However, without more context about the specific styling rules or themes being applied, it's difficult to provide further insights.

If you could provide more information about the purpose and requirements of this HTML code, I'd be happy to try and assist further!
 
I'm so down with using only semantic tags lol. Like, who needs accessibility for users with disabilities? It's not like they're trying to read the news or anything... 🀣 Just kidding, kinda. But seriously, why make it harder for people who need help when you can just use a little extra effort to make your site more user-friendly?
 
Ugh, this website is so outdated πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ. First off, can't they just use semantic tags already? It's like they're trying to make it hard for people with disabilities to navigate their site. And don't even get me started on the duplicate img tags... it's just lazy coding πŸ˜’. I mean, how hard is it to do it right once? And what's with all these weird CSS classes? It looks like they just threw some styling at it without thinking about how it would affect the rest of the site 🀯. Overall, this website just feels like a mess and needs some serious revamp 😴
 
omg i just tried to read that thing and my brain hurts lol what's going on with all those tags? cant they just use like regular html or something? πŸ˜‚ and why do they need so many classes? is it like a secret coding language or something? πŸ€” seriously tho, can someone explain this stuff in simple terms?
 
Wow 🀯, like what is going on here? So many HTML tags and classes, it's a bit overwhelming πŸ˜…. Interesting how they're using both semantic and non-semantic tags, hope it's not causing any accessibility issues for users with disabilities πŸ‘€.
 
omg u guys r still using tables 4 layout? 🀣 like what's wrong w/ css grids or flexbox? and btw why so many img tags in one article? can't they just use lazy loading or sumthin? πŸ˜… also wot's w/ all these random classes? did u even bother w/ a decent naming convention? πŸ™„
 
omg i feel u, like who uses semantic tags anymore πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ? i'm all for accessibility and whatnot but can't we just use html5 elements like img etc in a normal way instead of all these extra nested divs and stuff πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ. and yeah, the code looks super messy πŸ“πŸ’» ugh, it's like they just threw all the css classes at it without thinking about it 😩. anywayz, more info would be nice tho πŸ‘€
 
I'm intrigued by the proliferation of non-semantic tags in the provided HTML code snippet πŸ€”. While it's understandable that some legacy systems may rely on these tags for compatibility reasons, I strongly advocate for a gradual transition towards semantic tags πŸš€. By doing so, we can significantly enhance accessibility and maintainability for users with disabilities. Moreover, semantic tags provide a more structured approach to HTML markup, allowing for better collaboration among developers and reducing the likelihood of inconsistencies across different browsers πŸ”. That being said, I'd love to learn more about the specific context and requirements behind this code snippet πŸ’‘.
 
yeah I guess using semantic tags is like a good thing? makes sense that they're not always necessary but when u got a lot of pics or tables, it's nice to have them structured properly 😊. btw, why do web devs still use some old classes like "styles_img__gUAMI" πŸ€” seems like they should be updated by now πŸ’»
 
the new design for news sites is getting old πŸ™„. who thought it was a good idea to put all the images in one big ol' container and make everything just a bunch of paragraphs? my eyeballs are already hurting just looking at it 😴. and don't even get me started on the "semantic" tags... like who's checking? can we just have a simple layout for once? 1, 2, 3 columns would be perfect πŸ“Š.
 
I'm still trying to figure out how they make these news articles on the internet πŸ€”. Is it like a big word processor or something? Do people just type in their stories and it shows up on everyone's screens all at once? And what's with all the different fonts and colors? Can someone explain that stuff to me?
 
this html code snippet seems super messy 🀯 like they just threw a bunch of stuff together without thinking about how it would look on different devices or browsers... shouldn't there be some kinda standard for web pages anyway? πŸ€” and what's up with all the duplicated images? is that really necessary? πŸ“Έ
 
idk why devs still use divs everywhere πŸ€” i mean, they're not exactly semantically rich or anything, but at least they're familiar to most browsers right? but then again, semantic tags are supposed to be better for accessibility and whatnot... so like, do we really need to go full semantic mode all the time? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ also, i'm kinda curious about those CSS classes... are they like, generated dynamically or something? 😊
 
I got a weird feed on that site πŸ€”. All that HTML nonsense? Can't they just use a CMS or something already? And what's up with all these duplicate img tags? You'd think it'd make the page load faster than a snail 🐌.
 
Back
Top